Data is one of the main drivers behind the new industrial revolution. It’s a unique resource
that, when utilized correctly, allows businesses to operate more efficiently and effectively.
Centralized data storage solutions like data warehouses and data marts play a crucial role in
allowing companies to make the most out of their data.
What’s the difference between a data mart and a data warehouse, and which
might be a better fit for your business? Keep reading for a comparison
of these two data storage solutions.
What is data architecture?
Big data tends to be chaotic: it might come from a variety of sources and
in various formats and volumes. Combining different data sources into a
standardized, actionable format is no easy task. Thankfully, industry
has come up with several data architectures to streamline data
infrastructure implementation.
Each data architecture is a blueprint that defines data-related processes.
It governs how we collect, transform, store, and distribute data, as well
as how stakeholders use it. A well-defined architecture should reflect your
business’s data strategy. When properly implemented, a data architecture
should also provide a comprehensive view of your enterprise data while
enabling your end-users to access the data they need.
Data warehouses and data marts are among the most commonly employed data
architectures. Before looking at both in turn, we’ll cover some of the
most common misconceptions regarding data warehouses and data marts.
Top myths about data warehouses and data marts
Data warehouses and marts are not a single project but rather complex
systems comprising multiple smaller projects and processes.
They do not comprise a language, and you should not code them from scratch.
However, implementing their individual components does require knowledge
of programming languages.
Data warehouses and data marts are not abstract concepts but concrete
realizations of data architectures populated with real data.
They’re not exactly a “database.” Although the underlying technology
is similar to those of traditional databases, the term “database” generally
refers to transactional systems that are updated in real-time. Data
warehouses and marts are intended for analysis and are typically uploaded periodically.
Finally, data warehouses and data marts are not analysis software. But they do provide substrate
for efficient analyses and enhance business user productivity.
What is a data warehouse?
A data warehouse (DWH) is a database that consolidates multiple other databases
into a unified location. Traditionally, companies required two types of databases:
one for storage and another for analysis. This gave rise to DWHs, which were
developed to facilitate reporting and data analysis. There are a few
arguments for using data warehouses:
Databases meant for analysis require a different logical structure than
those meant for storage (“transactional databases”). Transactional databases
are complex and often consist of many interconnected tables. Compiling all
the data for analysis requires time, effort, and many complex
SQL queries.
By extracting data from multiple transactional systems and saving it to a
single location, DWHs reduce the amount of time spent wrangling and moving data
A data warehouse ensures that all of its data complies with a given
data standard. It removes redundancy and guarantees a
single version of the truth.
The end-result is that everyone in the company speaks the same data language
and works with the same figures.
Transactional systems are not suitable for real-time data access above a
certain scale. If you have a cluster of transactional databases with complex
references between them, any ad-hoc query can slow down the performance of
your entire cluster. Unlike transactional systems, DWHs are updated on a
schedule. This allows business users to query DWHs and get the data they
need right away, while the transactional systems continue operating smoothly.
But data warehouses are not without shortcomings.
For one, data warehouses have a slow time-to-market. It can take
months or years to integrate legacy, operations, and third-party
vendor data. DWHs also require resources to build, use, and maintain.
The cost can be high, so implementing a DWH needs solid justification.
We discuss this in greater depth in our article on
enterprise data warehouses.
What is a data mart?
You can think of a data mart as a smaller, domain-specific data warehouse.
A data mart does not offer an enterprise-wide view of data; it focuses
on processes specific to a business unit like marketing or finance. The
limited scope of data marts means they’re cheaper and faster to build compared to DWHs.
End-users can see a data mart as a black box. They care about retrieving
the data and analyzing it, and data marts provide the APIs they need.
Data warehouses usually require more complex queries, making data retrieval
not as straightforward.
Data marts can be built from an existing data warehouse (using a
“top-down approach”), or separately from data sources (using a “bottom-up
approach”). We illustrate both approaches below:
Both approaches have arguments in their favor. The top-down approach
ensures uniformity across your data marts, but you’ll require a DWH.
On the other hand, the bottom-up approach does not require a pre-existing
DWH. It is faster and more convenient for many businesses to build a data mart from scratch.
But the fragmented nature of data marts brings us back to a familiar problem.
Without proper data governance, corporate departments are able to create
overlapping data marts. This gives rise to conflicting data definitions,
redundancies, different data interfaces, and multiple competing sources of the truth.
To avoid this problem, it’s important that data marts conform to a company-wide
data standard. This will also prove useful for eventually integrating data marts
into a data warehouse.
Data mart vs. data warehouse: Which to implement?
Data warehouses are
almost unavoidable for companies that work with big data. This is especially
true for organizations who collect their own data with established
strategies and pipelines. Though implementation and maintenance costs
have historically been high, tools like Amazon Redshift, Snowflake,
and BigQuery make data warehouses increasingly more accessible.
If you’re a smaller company with limited resources and your company’s
analytics investment does not need to cover every department, you might
want to opt for data marts. They’re faster to implement, even without an
organization-wide data strategy in place. Once your business starts using
data marts, you can always consolidate them into a data warehouse.
For example, consider Company A, a 10-person law firm serving a small
number of clients. Because the firm collects a limited amount of data
on a small number of clients, a data mart can be a more practical
solution than a data warehouse.
On the other hand, consider Company B, a Fortune 500 utility company
with millions of customers and thousands of employees. In this case,
a data warehouse might make more sense as it’s able to store and maintain
larger datasets across multiple business departments.
The chart below provides a summary of the main differences between data warehouses
and data marts.
Data Warehouse
Data marts
Data
Enterprise-wide
Domain-specific
Focus
Data integration
Data integration
Intended users
Data scientists, engineers, and analysts
Any business user
Data sources
Many
Few
Design complexity
Complex
Simple
Time to market
Slow
Fast
Cost of implementation
High
Low
Need help implementing data storage?
In this article, we compared data warehouses to data marts. Both
solutions allow companies to more efficiently perform data analyses
and thus gain better insights. The choice between a data warehouse
and a data mart may depend on your data strategy, the size of
your company, and your resources.
Still not sure how to proceed? We’re happy to help!
At Mighty Digital we’re experts in planning, implementing, and
maintaining data storage solutions. We’ll help you implement the
right tooling to take your data-driven organization to the next level.
Vladyslav Hrytsenko
Top full-stack engineer and open-source contributor, data solutions architect. Chief Technology Officer at Mighty Digital